Almost all the
debate I am seeing is about whether cannabis helps people or drives
them psychotic or makes them ill, or both, which are medical issues.
Little mention of my or your human rights, which I never asked for
but was "given". The law is not actually about drugs or
plants or medicines, it is about what some people can or cannot do
with them - possession, production, supply.
If we have a right
to a private life then that must include the right to grow or possess
or even share with willing people, unless it threatens PUBLIC health,
public order, or the rights of others.
Issues such as
whether somebody else is cured of illness or has their pains or
tremors eased, or suffers from psychosis or even dies of cancer, has nothing
whatsoever to do with possession, production or sharing in PRIVATE.
What difference it makes to driving or singing skills, is not the issue when
it comes to private life.
Limits or otherwise on
strength, claims that childrenmay use cannabis or that some people later
take drugs, is not the issue when it comes to Private Life.
Billy Caldwell,
Alfie and other children, in fact, don't get me wrong, but their
survival has nothing to do with what we do in our private lives.
I say that because
the law targets our private lives; people get busted in their
homes even though they pose no threat or do no harm
IT SEEMS TO ME
obvious that those that get benefit from the cannabis plant or its
products that are otherwise inhumanely suffering or risking life
itself, should be protected by the Government, not punished by it,
and should have that medication available in a pure and safe form.
But that is a health
issue, Of course they have the right to live a healthy life.
Yet it is a different issue, and many of the politicians are talking
about allowing pharmaceutical grade cannabis or its products
including oils, on prescription. Well we know how much is already
being grown ready for that profitable situation to become acceptable
to the public, after the years of lies, by GW Pharmaceuticals and
British Sugar and who owns shared in those?
When somebody says
that cannabis use heals or harms, saves lives or ruins them, leads to
drug use or not, whether safer than aspirin or alcohol or sugar - I
have to ask
WHO SHOULD WE
ARREST?
Those that cannabis
consumption helps or those that cannabis harms?
Those that later take drugs or those that do not?
Those that eat sugar or those that do not?
Those that later take drugs or those that do not?
Those that eat sugar or those that do not?
Those that harm
others, or those that do not?
