Showing posts with label general election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label general election. Show all posts
Tuesday, 9 July 2024
Wednesday, 18 October 2017
Letter to Jeremy Corbyn and Labour: How to Win the next general election
Dear Mr Corbyn,
I would very much appreciate if you could read this brief document that was written over a decade ago but still applies today. The response we received from Carolyne Flynn at the time acknowledged our arguments but said that Labour would not change the law on cannabis because they thought it would lead to increased use and harm, despite the evidence, even then, that it is only a small percentage and number of consumers that experience harm and the vast majority that experience benefits (thus concluding that the vast majority of users would also benefit).
In addition to the points made in "The Challenge", there would be a huge saving in policing costs, a saving on NHS costs as so many people claim that cannabis enables them to stop using many expensive prescription medicines, an increase in general revenue through taxation on profits, consumer protection and removing control of supply away from criminal gangs and multi-drug dealers.
I sincerely believe that IF the Labour Party were to discuss the legalisation of cannabis at the next conference and include it in the next election manifesto, Labour would win that election - you would certainly gain my vote and those of many people that I know- we find it difficult or impossible tovote for Labour as a party that supports the prohibition of cannabis.
LINKED from this page is "The Challenge" document along with pages of letters to and from the Home Office.
I do hope that you can find the time to read it and reply.
http://www.ccguide.org/challenge/web/index.php?r=petition
Alun Buffry, Norwich North
======
I would very much appreciate if you could read this brief document that was written over a decade ago but still applies today. The response we received from Carolyne Flynn at the time acknowledged our arguments but said that Labour would not change the law on cannabis because they thought it would lead to increased use and harm, despite the evidence, even then, that it is only a small percentage and number of consumers that experience harm and the vast majority that experience benefits (thus concluding that the vast majority of users would also benefit).
In addition to the points made in "The Challenge", there would be a huge saving in policing costs, a saving on NHS costs as so many people claim that cannabis enables them to stop using many expensive prescription medicines, an increase in general revenue through taxation on profits, consumer protection and removing control of supply away from criminal gangs and multi-drug dealers.
I sincerely believe that IF the Labour Party were to discuss the legalisation of cannabis at the next conference and include it in the next election manifesto, Labour would win that election - you would certainly gain my vote and those of many people that I know- we find it difficult or impossible tovote for Labour as a party that supports the prohibition of cannabis.
LINKED from this page is "The Challenge" document along with pages of letters to and from the Home Office.
I do hope that you can find the time to read it and reply.
http://www.ccguide.org/challenge/web/index.php?r=petition
Alun Buffry, Norwich North
======
Reply received - do you think they read beyond the first mention of cannabis?
Dear Alun,
Thank you for your email. I appreciate you took the time to get in touch with us regarding the medical use of marijuana.
Please be assured that your comments have been passed on.
The Labour Party will ensure that all NHS patients get fast access to the most effective new drugs and treatments.
We will also insist on value-for-money agreements with pharmaceutical companies.
Thank you for getting in touch
Best wishes,
Jake
Membership Services and Correspondence
The Labour Party
Thursday, 20 April 2017
ASK THE CANDIDATES ABOUT CANNABIS LAW
Political parties do not necessarily insist that their candidates agree with every policy and the legal status of cannabis possession, cultivation and supply is one of those policies: hence Peter Lilley, Conservative, supports legalisation as does Paul Flynn, Labour, and others, despite the prohibition stance of their Parties. Likewise I have spoken to Lib Dems and Green Party candidates in the past who were against legalisation.
That said, many MP's and candidates will say they support "legalisation for medical use" without really explaining what they mean, being seemingly happy to see other victimless users and growers face fine, prison and criminal records.
Some, the dumbest of all, even continue to deny that cannabis itself has any medicinal value: that is how our governments have classified the plant in the Misuse of Drugs Act and theycontinue to deny medical benefits even despite Sativex THC and CBD products are now classified as having medicinal uses and all the evidence, anedotal or not, to the contrary!
THAT IS WHY it is essential for everyone to ask (write, telephone, attend Hustings, emai, whatever) for their personal view and how they would vote (Whip or not) on a bill to fully legalise cannabis possession, cultivation and supply.
OTHERWISE, personally, I could not possibly vote for any candidate either dumb enough or stubborn enough, who stands against legalisation and / or ignores the punishment of victimless consumers.
That is WHY I am ASKING YOU to ASK THE CANDIDATES.
PLEASE SHARE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)