By
early 1996 I had started writing letters again and began to take an
interest in the "CLCIA".
When
I had been convicted there were just over 80 members in the CLCIA,
most of them local – by the time I got out there were almost 200 –
but I did not feel impressed as it was over 3 years. I spoke with
Jack and Tina and agreed to get involved again, and said I thought we
needed to start a membership drive and make the campaign more
national – maybe even international.
Jack
and Tina had not done nothing whilst I was away – Jack had copied
many letters sent to literally hundreds of people in authority, from
MP's to Bishops, local doctors and healers, local cafés and pubs,
even world leaders, seeking support. Although some had deemed to
reply, there was little support. Amongst those that supported
legalisation were the Labour MP The Late Tony Banks, the eccentric
judge the Late Ernest Pickles, and a few journalists.
Jack
had focussed on Howard Marks aka Mr Nice aka many other names, who
had been arrested by US officials in Spain and taken back to the US
where he was given a 25-year prison sentence for moving quite large
quantities (tons) around the world. Jack – as did we all – wanted
to see Howard free – and it was about that time that he was
released and returned to the UK, so we were all overjoyed when we
heard that Howard Marks was out and back in the UK.
Jack
continued to insist that cannabis would be legal within 12 months. It
was sounding like "tomorrow" but "tomorrow never
comes". He was totally convinced that not only was he on a Holy
Mission but also that he was some sort of divinely-appointed
spokesman. He had a following, but I was not one of them.
DON
BARNARD
Whilst
I had been in prison, Jack and Tina had read newspaper reports and
made contact somehow – or vice versa – with several people that
were to become prominent in the UK cannabis campaign and some of whom
would become good friends. Don Barnard was one of these.
Don
was a few years older than me and had a completely different
background. He had been to school in Norwich and later married Jackie
and moved to Braintree, Essex, where they had children.
Don
had previously been involved with trades unions and had some
experience in politics.
He
had fought in a trial after being arrested for growing cannabis to
ease the pains that his wife suffered. He was one of the first people
to defend himself on medical grounds.
Throughout
my time as a cannabis campaigner, Don has shown himself to be one of
the most devoted and hardest working of people. I worked together
with Don over the years on many aspects of campaigning, including the
publication of our venture (a few years after this time) of "The
Challenge".
Don
attended and spoke at many events and conferences; he wrote numerous
letters to Government and press; he battled with his own MP and
councillors; he helped whenever he could – we always consulted on
the phone and many a time we either dropped or boosted an idea
depending on if, and how much, we agreed. His struggle continued
even though ill health made things difficult. I found Don to be one
of the most inspirational and friendly of all the campaigners I met.
He was the only person ever to be accepted for a with a Hone
Secretary of the UK – albeit the meeting was cancelled after the
Home Secretary, Charles Clarke, was sacked. That was in 2006.
THE
LATE DR ANNE BIEZANEK
Dr
Anne was a GP in Merseyside who was arrested after procuring cannabis
for her ailing daughter. She had to go for trial and also was at risk
of losing her license.
The
British Medical Council were understanding and helped her to some
small event, with her case. Dr Anne was allowed to keep her
daughter's medical condition out of the public eye, and she won her
case.
Dr
Anne endorsed the Family Council of Drug Abuse Europe (FCDA)
publication: "The Report" - along with many other
academics, judges and doctors. She was always supportive of the
campaign. I never met her but I know we had mutual respect.
I
never met Dr Anne, but respect for her grew after we exchanged
several letters and spoke a few times on the phone. Despite her
personal problems, she was always loyal to the cause.
In
2001, Dr Anne's sister, Leslie von Goetz, was to stand as an LCA
candidate and ran her campaign from her bed in Fife.
THE
FCDA EUROPE
I
never met Kenn and Joanna d'Doudney, the authors of "Cannabis:
The Facts, Human Rights and the Law -
The Report of the FCDA Europe",
but I dealt with them by mail.
The
Report itself is extremely hard to read, hardly written in plain
English for the average person to read without the aid of a
dictionary – and a dictionary that covered Latin phrases too.
However,
it was, for me, a convincing argument that the laws against cannabis
possession, cultivation and supply were not only unworkable and
unjust but also illegal in themselves. The prohibition of cannabis
was the result of a conspiracy that favoured pharmaceutical and
petrochemicals, they said. It was a "Crime Against Humanity".
The
report was full of good arguments and fact. It was endorsed by
judges, doctors, economists and academics.
The
FCDA claimed that The Report was admissible in evidence at trial.
Kenn
also offered to help people defend themselves in Court, saying that
The Report could be cited and they could be called as "Expert
Witnesses"
The
problem arose, however, that they showed themselves to be completely
intolerant of people that neither did not understand or did not agree
with every word they said or wrote. That led to pointless arguments.
Worse
still, they became abusive and tended to suddenly refuse to
communicate any more or to help the several people that wanted to use
them.
If
we disagreed, they called us "prohibitionists". If we
mentioned the word "decriminalisation", we were called
"prohibitionists".
Maybe
they did not know just how much of an insult some of use took that to
be. For people that spend their lives fighting cannabis prohibition,
it was one of the worst of insults. It seemed that they were
applying it to almost everyone.
The
crux came when my good friend Simon was busted for possession. Simon
had been convicted with me of conspiracy in 1992 and had served 2 out
of a 6-year sentence. Now he had to go to court again, possibly
facing prison, so, through me, he turned to The Report and its
authors for help.
This
was to happen in 1998.
I
never met anyone from the FCDA Europe. To me they seemed to be living
their lives in isolation in France, issuing orders and asking
everyone to buy their book.
I
must say that although I found the book itself inspirational, I
cannot say the same for the authors
LINDA
HENDRY
Linda
ran the Legalise Cannabis Campaign, Scotland, for several years
before I heard of her and when I did, I wrote on behalf of the CLCIA.
We obviously needed to work together. Linda was a veteran campaigner
and associated with the Scottish Green Party. She was a brave
schoolteacher indeed, to be a committed campaigner too.
I
didn't meet Linda until several years later. I am glad that I did.
Linda
is still campaigning as I write this book – she must be one of the
longest-running cannabis campaigners in the world.
NORWICH MEETINGS
The
CLCIA held irregular meetings in Norwich. Most attracted between 10
and 15 people and largely consisted of toking sessions as if we had
to burn it all up as fast as possible, with me trying to keep the
meetings to an agenda.
To
be honest, although they were fun, I would hardly say that they were
productive. It put me off meetings!
Activities
in the CLCIA were mostly due to the efforts of Jack, Tina and myself.
There was plenty of support but also plenty of excuses when it came
to actually doing something.
Jack
has accumulated several boxes of fliers that they had had printed
whilst I was away. When I discovered them I asked Jack why he was
keeping them:
"Why
don't we give them out at fairs and festivals, Jack?"
"There's
no hurry," he said, "They are part of the history."
But
for unforeseen circumstances that were soon to hit us, I do believe
Jack would still have them today.
We
held most of the meetings either in Jack's Yard or in a local café
We
produced new fliers, and I started to build my web site, The Cannabis
Campaigner's Guide, CCGUIDE (http://www.ccguide.org) which was to
provide information, news and contacts for cannabis campaigners.
I
met Derek Williams. I had written to Derek in 1992, after reading his
letter in the Norwich Evening News, but was banged up before I got to
meet him. However, he did make the effort to go down to Jack's Yard
and by the time I was out and about again, he had become involved
with the CLCIA, albeit from his personal anti-tobacco approach.
All
was not well between Derek Williams and the some of the other CLCIA
members who claimed that Derek was trying to "high-jack"
the campaign to become pro-cannabis but anti-tobacco. Things were at
a boiling point.
Derek
has been one of the most argumentative of all the active cannabis
campaigners I ever met, often to the point of being disruptive: he
was committed only to his way, harm reduction, and often appeared top
me as a "control freak", wanting strict regulations.
I
tried to heal the rifts, tried to make sure that Derek was given a
chance to put forward his views, but I failed in that.
He
would often resort to abusiveness in discussions that became rows,
calling people "silly". I told him that I had just spent
over four years in places where he would not have said those things
in public without repercussions, that it was simply not polite.
On
one occasion, when Howard Marks was due to make an appearance on a TV
show called The Warehouse, in Norwich, and several of us managed to
get tickets to attend, Derek turned up and complained that Mick Pryce
was not dressed suitably, even though Mick was only a member of the
audience and not due to speak and even though it was actually nothing
to do with Derek. Mick felt so insulted that he left.
I
do believe Derek contributed much effort but had his people
management skills been better, he would have achieved far more.
Instead, he alienated so many. A shame.
GENERAL
ELECTION 1997: HOWARD MARKS
Mid-1996
we were looking towards the next General Election, this time vowing
that we would not let other parties prevent us from having our say
and we wanted to put up at least one candidate.
We
all thought it would be wonderful if we could get Howard Marks to
stand for CLCIA in the 1997 General Election – all we needed to do
was meet him and ask.
Howard
had been labelled by the press as the cannabis "Mr Big" and
"Mr Cannabis" of the 1970's and 1980's – he had
supposedly brought huge quantities of cannabis to the UK from
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Morocco, Lebanon and other places.
Many
of the tokers of those days had smoked Howard's product which was
probably all excellent – he had become the UK's Mr Cannabis.
Howard
had written a book called "Mr Nice" and, guess what – it
started off with Howard driving to Norwich to buy a passport in the
name of Donald Nice, a local builder whom I had known but who had
since passed away.
I
had wondered if Howard Marks was the Welshman that Donald Nice had
brought to my basement flat for an hour for a smoke – it later
turned out that it has been, and we toked on some fine Lebanese hash
that Howard later told he he had probably had imported.
Donald
pronounced his name "Niece" (like the French town) but
Howard pronounced it "Nice" (as the opposite of "nasty")
I was glad Howard had not become Mr Nasty – whenever I met him he
always seemed nice!
We
would fight both Norwich constituencies
First
we announced that we would select two candidates, one for each
Norwich North and Norwich South.
UK:
Pro-drug party to fight election seat
David
Barrett
Evening
News, Norwich
Wednesday
3 July 1996
Pro-cannabis
campaigners are to put forward a candidate at the next general
election in Norwich North, it was revealed last night The local
pressure group will be one of the first to run in a parliamentary
election on a pro cannabis ticket. The Norwich-based Campaign to
Legalise Cannabis International Association will choose between four
potential candidates later this month. Chairman Jack Girling said:
"There's still no headway for legalisation after 25 years of
campaigning, so the next step is to give the issue to the people.
"There's
a groundswell of opinion that cannabis should be legalised."Mr
Girling says the candidate would seek election under the name of the
Cannabis Party and he expects to attract at least 5000 votes,
retaining the £500 election deposit. The drug, which is also known
as dope hash, pot or weed, is usually smoked in cigarette form and is
thought to be used by up to 1.5 million people in the UK. Supporters
say it is a harmless alternative to alcohol or tobacco which can help
relieve chronic pain from cancer, arthritis, multiple sclerosis and
glaucoma. The local campaign, which has 280 members, will canvas
homes in the city to attract votes. "We hope to get more
awareness of the facts about cannabis," said Mr Girling.
Director of the drugs and legal advice agency Release, Mike Goodman,
believes this will be one of the first examples of a pro-cannabis
candidate in a British election. Similar candidates are expected to
run for seats elsewhere at the general election."We always have
a no smoking policy at our election counts," said returning
officer for Norfolk North, John Bryant
Then
we named the candidates we had chosen.
Ready
for polls, Legalise pot group makes its choice
Evening
News, Norwich
Saturday
7 Sep 1996
A
SELF-EMPLOYED labourer and a mature student are to contest Norwich's
two Parliamentary seats - calling for cannabis to be legalised.
Michael Pryce, 50, and John Adam, 44, were approved by members of the
Campaign to Legalise Cannabis International Association. And a
spokesman for the organisation, which has over 350 members in the
county, said they were hoping to attract at least 5000 votes in both
Norwich constituencies."Originally we were only going to put up
a candidate in Norwich North," he added."But a lot of our
members live in the Norwich South area and were disappointed they
weren't going to be given the chance to cast their votes as well."Mr
Pryce, a divorced labourer with no children, lives at Aylmer Towers,
Mile Cross and will fight Norwich South. He is also a tenant
representative on the Mile Cross area Housing Committee. Mr Adam is
married with two daughters aged 19 and 12. He lives in Gildencroft,
off St Augustine's, and was a free-lance design assistant before
starting as a theoretical physics student at the University of East
Anglia. Bashir Khanbhal, Conservative candidate for Norwich South, a
pharmacist, said voters would not be interested. "Quite frankly
I think it is an insult to the British voter that they are being
asked to vote on a single issue. Most reasonably intelligent people
will want the chance to consider a whole manifesto," he said.
Labour's constituency party chooses its candidate at a meeting on
October 6. Party bosses are thought to want to whittle the candidates
down to a short-list of six this weekend. Agent John Cook said:
"Single issue candidates are an irrelevance in General Elections
- and there is data to prove that."
Ha!
So the Tory did not think intelligent people would vote for a single
issue party and Labour thought a single issue candidates were
irrelevant! Those attitudes were part of our reason for standing;
they put themselves on pedestals.
We
wanted Howard Marks to stand so we started trying to make contact.
It
was not long before we heard that Rob Christopher, who later changed
his name by deed pole to Free Cannabis, had booked an old cinema in
London for a cannabis conference, and that Howard Marks were amongst
the speakers.
An
opportunity not to be missed. So we booked a van and a dozen or so of
us went along, including Jack and Tina.
It
was there that we asked Howard, first privately then publicly, to
stand for election. He said yes as long as it was on the single issue
of cannabis. Just what we wanted.
Jack
and Tina had been booked to speak at Free Rob's Cannabis Conference,
but Tina said she'd prefer me to take her place. We were actually
announced as "Jack and Teeni" - I guess I was Teeni! That
did not help. I suggested to Jack that we use the same formula that
had been so successful a few years earlier when Will Hutchinson and I
addressed the Cambridge Institute of Criminology. Jack agreed – we
were to take turns speaking.
I
did ten minutes as an opener and passed the microphone to Jack.
Jack
said :"OK then, so how many of you think cannabis should be
legalised?"
Silence.
Then
a few murmurs. "That's why we're here!", somebody shouted.
"Where you at?" said somebody else.
There were only about
30 people in the room but all were waiting for Jack to continue. He
didn't. It seemed like he'd frozen up! So I carried on, spoke for
about ten minutes, and that was that.
Howard
Marks later came on and I asked him if he would stand in Norwich on
the single issue, at the next election, and he agreed.
This
was to be the start of a new era in my life; again.
MORE
THAN ONE SEAT
We
decided to let the world know that Howard Marks would stand for
election on the single issue of cannabis.
We
did this by spreading the news as a 'rumour', asking people to keep
it quiet and not tell anyone else.
Within
a few days the local newspaper, the Evening News in Norwich, phoned
Jack and asked him about the rumour. He said it was true and they
wrote an article. That kind of made it official!
The
CLCIA was about to contest our first General Election and we decided
we could fight both Norwich North and Norwich South as parliamentary
candidates could stand in as many constituencies as they liked so
long as they had the deposits and nominees. That had apparently been
quite common in the 19th century to ensure some people won at least
one set. But if a candidate did win more than one seat, they had to
take no more than one.
Howard
decided to stand in Neath, near his home town in Wales, and
Southampton Test, in the General Election of 1997. There were others
to organise those constituencies: I would focus on trying to help out
in Norwich.
BANNED
FROM STALL FOR GIVING AWAY FOOD
Meanwhile,
in Norwich, we were about to get into trouble with Norwich City
Council for giving away harmless but nutritious hemp seeds from our
Information stall in the city centre. We were buying them by the kilo
at £1 a time from local shops. We gave away both cooked and
flavoured, and untouched seeds along with information on hemp.
Pro-cannabis
group banned from city market
Evening
News, Norwich
Monday
13 Jan 1997
Pro-cannabis
campaigners have been banned from a Norwich market after handing out
seeds of the illegal plant. The Campaign to Legalise Cannabis
International Association gave the seeds to people visiting an
information stall. And Norwich City Council has banned the
organisation from the Haymarket after complaints from the public.
But the campaign - which plans to contest Norwich's two parliamentary
seats at the General Election - is ~ threatening a court injunction
against the hiring of any council property by political groups. A
spokesman said "The CLCIA considers the refusal to hire the
stall would put our candidates at a disadvantage".The row
follows a display by the group in December at the Haymarket. Police
received 10 complaints about the distribution of seeds.
Distributing cannabis seeds is not illegal - the question of legality
only arises when they have grown into plants. Helen Selleck, the
council's community arts and events officer, said: "We recognise
this was not an illegal activity. But they acted outside the terms of
their contract. Some complaints suggested seeds were handed out to
young people"Norfolk police drugs education officer Richard
Price said: "Cannabis seed once grown is an illegal substance".
Several
issues arose out of the ban and the press report. I was sad to see
Richard Pryce (no relation to Mick) claiming that cannabis was an
illegal substance – it was in fact illegal to possess, cultivate or
supply. As for Helen Selleck, she was unable to show that we were in
breach of contract and we were allowed to use our stall again. But
that was after what became our first successful international action
– a powerful letter and email campaign from around the world, in
our support, to Norwich City Council's Community and Events Office.
Helen told me she had been on holiday for a week and came back to
hundreds of messages. It also turned out that six of the seven people
that had complained were police officers! Upset that we were not
breaking the law?
The
Council then agreed that we could have our stall back on condition
that we gave away only cooked seeds. We agreed as we felt we had no
choice and the Information Stall was more important than this
particular battle. However, we DID give away uncooked seed – to the
pigeons!
The
stall was run mostly by Mick Pryce and Mick Fell, bot now deceased,
and Mick Brown. The "Three Micks!"
THE
UNIVERSAL CHURCH OF THE HOLY AND SACRED HERB – UCHASH
Jack
Girling went on to found his "Universal Church of the Holy and
Sacred Herb" (UCHASH) and they organised a session for smoking a
chillum in the Cloisters of Norwich Cathedral after several letters
were sent to the Bishop asking for a meeting, with no success.
I
was not a member of that Church – I am not sure I even understood
it – but I supported their Rights. So when I saw on TV that the
police had "pounced" on a a circle of people smoking the
chillum in the open air, all filmed by Anglia TV, I was outraged.
As
the Chillum was passed amidst cries of "Boom Shankar" and
"Alli Ali Ganja", the police pounced. They had been hiding
behind some of the pillars surrounding the Cathedral cloisters.
The
police just took the chillum off one of the people in the circle. It
was filled with lavender. Police stopped the religious ceremony to
search them all.
Jack
had a small piece of cannabis resin in his pocket – for some
unknown reason -and was arrested.
I
wrote to the Police Complaints Authority (run by police) and
eventually received a visit at my house which was stinking of
freshly-smoked weed. The one officer said he was not interested in
that, just what I had to say. He told me I was the only person in the
UK to have complained. I asked if it would remain on record and when
he said yes, I dropped my complaint. What was the point if I was the
only one.
I
helped Jack get his court case together and the Judge even said he
could call whosoever he wished, even the Bishop and Dean of Norwich
cathedral, and the Home Secretary.
It
was the most disappointing court case I ever witnessed. It was, for
me, a massive opportunity, but Jack decided that quoting one sentence
from the Bible and one sentence from Human Rights, was enough. He
presented the Jury with two or three pieces of paper and said "I
rest my case". He was convicted unanimously. It was on the day
of the anniversary of Human Rights
.
FIRE
It
was not long after that DISASTER struck.
I
was awoken in the early hours with by phone calls first from Tina
Smith, Jack's partner, then from Derek Williams, telling me Jack's
Yard had been burned down. I watched it on the TV News.
Derek
rang back and said he wanted to say that it may have been an arson
attack by a group opposed to the CLCIA. I said I wanted to find out
more before saying anything. Suddenly Derek was on the news saying we
had been attacked.
The
Yard and the CLCIA HQ were gone, burned to the ground in a ferocious
fire – all that wood, and paper and paint and canisters of gas,
they had to spray the nearby houses with water to keep them cool.
After
that, the number of new members per week dropped to almost zero. We
had nowhere to meet. We had lost many of our records. Jack and Tina,
not even insured, were devastated.
I
don't know how, but we pushed on. Jack, Tina and volunteers searched
the cinders for anything remotely useful – I guess that was there
way of handling the trauma. Somebody gave us a caravan and we sat in
that for our meets.
The
police never convicted anyone for arson – they had caught just one
guy caught running away. He claimed that thugs had thrown him onto
the roof from the nearby Magdalene Street fly-over, had crashed
through the roof to find a fire burning. Personally I never thought
it was an organisation behind the fire, but maybe somebody local
hated us enough?
It
was devastating for Jack and Tina – they had lost their property,
their business and their income.
SUE
NEAL AND PARADOX DELIGHTS
I
rented a shop in St Augustine's Street in Norwich. This was with the
help of Sue whom I had met at the Yard. We called it "Paradox
Delights" after a Dutch Coffeeshop called "Paradox"
which was to try to show the paradox of the law. It was just a small
shop with a low rent and we would use it as Election Campaign HQ,
sell skins and artwork.
We
thought that if we could sell just 100 packets of skins (rolling
papers) a week it would cover the rent. It was a struggle, especially
when volunteer staff failed to show or in one case turned a blind eye
to shoplifters.
To
the rear of the shop was a small print works run by Alex; Alex was a
great help, then, in helping get our printing done.
There
was a friendly café next door, run by several campaign supporters.
We had our meetings there – usually 13 of us. I never know why so
many of our small local meetings had 13 of us attending? Jack thought
that was significant. I think he thought twelve of us, not always the
same twelve, were his disciples.
Howard
Marks came to Norwich and I remember as if it was yesterday him
walking into Paradox Delights. I discovered that in fact I had met
him in the late 70's, when he was in Norwich to get his Mr Nice
passport. Small world for sure.
ESCORTING
HOWARD
I
took Howard to several local shops that were supporting us, like
Martin Wyatt's "Head in the Clouds" which was one of the
very first "head shops" in Britain.
I
also took Howard to the caravan in the burnt-out Yard. Everywhere he
went people wanted him to sample their crop, tell them it was good.
In the evenings Howard wanted to visit pubs and clubs to gather
support.
I
must say that campaigning was fun although difficult to get many
people to help.
I
spoke with Howard and we agreed that in an attempt to create and show
unity, we would invite Derek Williams to take the role of Election
Agent for Howard. I am still not sure that was a good idea as Howard
and Derek differed strongly on the tobacco issue but Derek played his
part and on one occasion spoke at Hustings in Norwich North.
One
evening about ten of us went with Howard to a local night club. I
must say that was a new experience for many of us; we weren't all
night club people!
We
were being followed about, at that time, by several people with
cameras that wanted to produce a video record of our campaigning. So
the cameras were also on us in the night club.
At
one point an attractive young girl came over and said she recognised
Howard and wanted to ask some questions. She was very friendly, even
shared a joint (smoking was allowed in night clubs in those days,
although smoking joints was done discreetly).
JD,
one of the founders of the CLCIA, asked her "Are you a
policeman?"
"Yes",
she said, "but I work in London. I am just up in Norwich for the
weekend and off duty. I do support you, but please don't put my face
on camera."
JD
must have had a good nose for sniffing out police! Ha!
At
the University of East Anglia (UEA), Howard gained the support of
"Tricky"; everyone cheered him, this was beginning to look
like an easy election – if only they all lived locally and were
registered to vote. Support on the street whilst handing out fliers,
was good too – we had lots of names on our petitions on the
Information stalls. Of course there were the occasional negative
comments and even verbal abuse – but the range of people that
supported us was impressive – even some of the police.
We
came across the local Green Party candidate sometimes, whilst we were
out campaigning.
Whilst
she was for sure sincere, she knew nothing about cannabis – and
neither did any of the other candidates, one of whom was Charles
Clarke, who won the seat and later became Home Secretary for Labour.
As
time went on we became less fearful and more confident in our shop –
Paradox Delights – and it became a focal point for the campaign –
we put posters in the window; we "came out", decided to let
people know why we were there.
The
trouble was that we were hardly generating enough money to pay the
bills.
POLITICAL
ELECTIONEERING
Derek
Williams was appointed as Howard Mark's election agent, at my
suggestion in an attempt to bring unity, although I was the one to
hand in the Nomination papers and the £500 deposit demanded from
anyone that wants to stand for Parliament. I also spent much of my
time taking Howard Marks around when he was in the area. Howard was
also contesting two other Constituencies, Neath and Southampton Test
and he had to put in an appearance or two, at least, in each. I had
plenty of time to get to know Howard: we were similar but different.
We had both been born in Wales, come across cannabis at University,
recognised its potential, done fairly lengthy prison sentences and
written books. Howard liked to indulge in alcohol, tobacco and
cannabis, seemingly as much as possible. I had no objection to that.
I do think, however, that I have more of a liking for food.
At
one Hustings in Norwich South, Derek Williams, from the audience,
asked which candidates had smoked cannabis. Of course Howard
immediately admitted it, as did Adrian Holmes the Green Party
candidate, but the big surprise was Charles Clarke, who said he
smoked it in the USA whilst at University. He repeated (and
explained) this in press interviews later. He was in fact one of the
first UK MP's to admit to having toked cannabis. I did not get on so
well when I asked at the next Hustings how many of those that
admitted to having smoked cannabis would turn themselves into the
police. Only Howard said that he would and, in fact, had.
We
went out campaigning on the streets, to the University of East
Anglia, Norwich City college, several clubs and bars. I can't say it
was easy getting people to come along from Jack's Yard to help us:
they preferred, seemingly, to sit around a fire and get stoned.
As
a result of all that a film was shown on TV the next year, late at
night, and is still available to watch on line. It is called "Howard
Makes His Mark" and although showing exactly what was happening
in the public eye, I cannot say it put everyone in good light. It
even has Howard saying that he did not see eye-to-eye with Derek
whom, Howard said ".. seems to have his own agenda."
BUSTER
NOLAN
Buster
was a Druid and a friend of Don Barnard and lived in Essex, near
Braintree. Although he was not a member of our group, he stood up for
hemp and for changing the law. He was greatly involved with saving
the trees and said that hemp was a cousin of the trees. He stood for
election in Braintree in 1997 on behalf of his New Millennium, New
Way Party and seemed to go down well with his eccentric manners of a
poet.
A
RESULT – OF SORTS?
The
day of the election and the "count" came and soon the
declarations of the results came.
There
were two vote counts, one each for Norwich North and Norwich South,
in different locations. Most of us, along with Howard, went to
Norwich North where we thought we would get our best result. Derek
was there being very optimistic - "I think we've done really
well," he told Howard and I.
Candidates
are allowed to take a specified number of "Counting Agents"
to watch, but not interfere with, the counting of votes. It was, to
say the least, boring. Fortunately, we were able to pop out for
refreshments and a toke.
Howard
gained about the same percentage in each constituency: 1.1 to 1.6%. I
thought that was quite good considering it was our first election,
but Howard seemed pretty devastated. His percentages in Neath and
Southampton were a little lower.
The
problem was, we said, that so many of our supporters were either not
even registered to vote, or never bothered – and then we had those
that supported us but were loyal to other parties. But we had gained
some publicity, raised the debate, and spoke to and in front of our
two new MP's: in Norwich South, Charles Clarke who later became Home
Secretary and in fact the only Home Secretary at the time of writing
that ever agreed to meet us; in Norwich North Dr Ian Gibson for
Labour, who supported legalisation. 1.6% was enough to do so
somewhere in the future.
There
was at that time no such thing as "Legalise Cannabis Party"
but that is what the press called us - Howard was an independent.
No comments:
Post a Comment