Thursday, 17 September 2026

From Dot to Cleopatra: A Complete History of Ancient Egypt

 From Dot to Cleopatra on Amazon


rom Dot to Cleopatra: A Concise History of Ancient Egypt is Alun Buffry's historical guide to ancient Egyptian civilisation, first published in 1997 by Frontier and later republished by ABeFree Publishing. The original edition is listed at 232 pages, while the current edition is substantially longer.

What the book covers

The book attempts to take the reader on a journey through the whole span of ancient Egyptian history, beginning before recorded history and continuing through the pharaohs to the death of Cleopatra VII—and, according to the publisher's description, somewhat beyond it. It covers:

  • The early development of Egyptian civilisation
  • The pharaohs and dynasties
  • Egyptian gods and mythology
  • The pyramids
  • The Sphinx and other monuments
  • Obelisks and mummies
  • Egyptian geography and the Nomes (administrative regions)
  • Archaeological discoveries
  • Legends and historical mysteries
  • Theories about ancient Egypt
  • A guide to visiting ancient Egyptian sites
  • Tables listing pharaohs and gods

The British National Bibliography classifies it under Egyptian civilisation and history to 332 BC, although the book's own description extends the story through Cleopatra VII, whose death was in 30 BC.

Buffry's approach

What seems distinctive about the book is that Buffry is trying to make an enormous and complicated subject accessible to a general reader. The publisher describes it as a "plain-speaking guide" that assumes no previous knowledge of Egyptian history. Rather than giving you a highly academic specialist study, it tries to guide you through thousands of years without getting overwhelmed by names, dates and dynasties.

The book also seems to have a balanced-but-curious attitude toward mysteries. The publisher's description says Buffry was trained in science and did not accept claims without evidence, but also did not automatically dismiss theories simply because he disagreed with them.

Why the title is interesting

The title From Dot to Cleopatra is deliberately broad. "Dot" suggests the beginning of everything—before conventional written history—while Cleopatra represents the end of the traditional pharaonic story.

In that sense, the book is really asking: How did one of the world's earliest great civilisations develop, flourish and eventually come to an end?

A useful way to think about the book

I'd describe it as sitting somewhere between:

A history book — because it gives a chronological account of Egypt.

A reference guide — because of its tables of pharaohs, gods and other information.

A mystery book — because it discusses the unanswered questions and theories surrounding ancient Egypt.

A travel companion — because it includes guidance on ancient sites for people visiting Egypt.

That combination makes it potentially useful for someone who wants an accessible introduction to Egyptology, rather than a narrowly academic study. The publisher specifically says it can be read quickly or dipped into repeatedly as a reference.

The other interesting detail is that Buffry himself has a longstanding personal connection with Egypt and later wrote Myhat in Egypt – Through the Eyes of a God and included his Egyptian travels in Heads, Hats and Tall Tales.

My overall impression: From Dot to Cleopatra seems best understood as Buffry's attempt to make the entire story of ancient Egypt approachable, while retaining a sense of wonder about the things we still don't know. It isn't presented as a conventional specialist Egyptology textbook; its appeal is the breadth of the journey and the author's willingness to explore both established history and the enduring mysteries of Egypt.

AncientA 

Scientists Found a 4,000-Year-Old Tomb—With a Door No Living Human Could Open

 Scientists Found a 4,000-Year-Old Tomb—With a Door No Living Human Could Open 

POPULAR MECHANICS
 By

Here’s what you’ll learn when you read this story:

  • Buried in the necropolis of Saqqara around 4,000 years ago, Sekhentyu-Ptah was an elite of society whose tomb was recently discovered by archaeologists excavating the area.
  • Inscriptions on funerary objects indicate that he had several roles, including priest and supervisor of the king’s works and documents.
  • There was also a false door in the tomb, not to fool potential looters, but instead for the deceased to enter and leave the afterlife at will.

Among the sands of the Egyptian desert lies Saqqara, a necropolis where the first pharaohs and elites of the Old Kingdom were buried in tombs known as mastabas that were carved out of limestone. It was in one such tomb that the mummified body of a high-ranking official known as Sekhentyu-Ptah began his journey to the afterlife. While the tomb has long since been looted, it still offers a glimpse into life and death at the dawn of pharaonic rule 4,000 years ago.

According to Egypt’s Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities, archaeologists discovered Sekhentyu-Ptah’s tomb while excavating the Bubasteion necropolis at Saqqara. The necropolis takes its name from the Bubasteion, a temple complex dedicated to the cult of Bastet, where worshippers from the Nile Delta city of Bubastis venerated the feline goddess and left offerings. Although the temple itself was built long after Sekhentyu-Ptah’s time, there’s evidence that the cult of Bastet had already formed during the Old Kingdom: vessels depicting the goddess in her cat and lioness forms have been found at the Step Pyramid of Djoser, built around 2650 B.C.E. And while the tomb may not have been directly associated with the cult of Bastet, its surviving artifacts illustrate the life and afterlife of an official who held many senior titles in Egyptian society.

More From Popular MechanicsTypes of Vacuum Brush Rolls

When the archaeological team investigated this tomb, they encountered a false door in the remains of a funerary chapel. A common sight in Egyptian tombs, “doors” like this one were once thought to deter and confuse grave robbers, but they were actually intended for the dead instead of the living. Ancient Egyptians believed that the deceased could enter and exit the afterlife at will through a door that no human alive would be able to open. In front of the false door, priests or mourners placed several funerary objects, among them a purification basin, an offering table, and an offering disk. Hieroglyphic inscriptions on these items identified them as belonging to Sekhentyu-Ptah and listed his titles, of which there were many: a royal chamberlain, supervisor of the king’s works, supervisor of the king’s documents, supervisor of scribes, and priest of the goddess of order and justice Ma’at, according to a statement from the ministry.

 Priests of Ma’at functioned as judges. They sought to resolve disputes by upholding the principles of truth and balance, which every Egyptian was expected to live by (rather than strict legalities), and dishonesty was a severe violation. Serving Ma’at must have helped Sekhentyu-Ptah in the afterlife. Egyptians feared the consequences of the goddess weighing the sins in their hearts against a feather and finding the heart was heavier, in which case the soul would be thrown down to the jaws of Ammit, the crocodile-headed devourer of the dead with the forelegs of a lion and the hindquarters of a hippopotamus. Embalmers sometimes placed a scarab over the heart of the deceased in the process of mummification, so any questionable deeds could be hidden and the heart would appear pure enough not to outweigh the dreaded feather.

Saqqara is a UNESCO World Heritage site for good reason. It is an archipelago of tombs that includes relics of the Old Kingdom and burials from later periods. Also revealed near the tomb of Sekhentyu-Ptah was a network of burial shafts that looters also raided in antiquity, but which still contained human remains and funerary objects. Archaeologists also uncovered more than a hundred shabti figures, servant statuettes intended to take on every task in the afterlife while their master luxuriated in the Field of Reeds. Shabtis originated as a humane alternative to sacrificing a pharaoh’s actual servants, and at first they accompanied only royals to the tomb. But after artisans devised a way to mass-produce the figures—crafted from faience, an earthenware coated in blue, green, or turquoise glaze—they eventually became accessible to most Egyptians.


Thursday, 10 September 2026

Lessons Learned

You are unique - there is,never was and never will be another you - it took the Universe many billions of years to make you out of once was and one will be again, star dust - dust that walks and talks, thinks and ponders, like and dislikes, is liked and not liked, eats and drinks and produces waste ...

 So, VALUE yourself, respect yourself,  don't worry about what others think or say about you.

Three rules for every living thing: we come through the wall of birth and head to the wall of death, kept apart by the Breath - appreciate that and give gratitude for it(to whoever or whatever you want), for without it we will not be here, on Earth.

Appreciate and try to enjoy our time here - seek peace, joy and fulfilment within as it is unlikely that the world or other people will lead you there.

Do not try to build oneself up by putting others down.

Do not waste time moaning or worrying about that which it is not within your power to change, but focus alone or together on what can be improved better for us all.

Keep the company of those that we like and want to be like - walk away from those that are not in keeping with who we want to be.

Don't strive for success in the eyes of others - just BEING HERE you are a success and no opinion should deny that!

Don't argue over beliefs - everyone has their own and they are only beliefs -focus on what you KNOW.

Get your inner candle lit - it must surely be better to live in the Light of Knowledge of SELF than in the darkness of ignorance and fear.  

Do not envy or be jealous of others - be happy with the fact that you are alive and that is the greatest think of all.

KNOW YOURSELF - your truth self, not just your mind or body - but who you really are - and for those that don't know, seek that first - and for those that do, maybe try to help others find their way.

Try to follow your "heart" rather than just your thoughts.

Try to enjoy life without harming others or ones surroundings.

Monday, 7 September 2026

Introducing IF ONLY SUOMI - a time-travel romance set in Leeds 1972

 

On AMAZON and KINDLE

The heart of the story: At its simplest, If Only Suomi is a love story built around time travel. The premise is that Al, coming from 2028, travels back to 1972 for just three days. While there, he falls in love with Suomi. He then has to return to his own time, leaving the woman he loves in the past. The central emotional question is therefore not just "Can you travel through time?" but "What would you do if you found the love of your life in the wrong time?"

That gives the novel a strong feeling of longing and regret. The phrase If Only becomes almost a philosophy: If only I could go back. If only I had made a different choice. If only I could see that person again. The really unusual part: is it fiction? This is where the book gets much more intriguing.

Buffry's own introduction says that he doesn't see the book as fitting neatly into fiction or non-fiction. He describes it as containing elements of memories, dreams, prophecy and wishful thinking, and suggests that it is "some sort of time travel"—even if that travel takes place only in the mind.

So you can read it on at least two levels:

1. As science fiction: Al literally travels from 2028 to 1972, creating the classic problems of time travel—paradoxes, changing the past, and potentially altering or erasing one's own future.

2. As a psychological story: The time travel can be understood metaphorically. Human beings constantly travel through time in their minds. We remember the past, dream about it, imagine alternative versions of our lives, and wonder what might have happened if we had made different decisions.

Buffry explicitly plays with this idea of "dreams within dreams" and asks where the boundary lies between dreams, memories, imagination and reality. The time-travel paradoxes

The book also seems to be interested in the classic philosophical problems of time travel.

Buffry's description specifically raises the possibility of someone travelling back and changing their own past—and even the possibility of "wiping oneself out of time altogether."

That makes the book less about scientific explanations of time travel and more about the philosophical consequences of it. Why 1972 matters

The choice of 1972 is particularly interesting because it connects the fictional premise with Buffry's own life and interests. Buffry was born in 1950, and his bibliography includes autobiographical and travel works connected with the 1970s, including All About My Hat: The Hippy Trail 1972.

The book's combination of romance + time travel + dreams + autobiography is more significant than the straightforward plot summary suggests. Buffry describes the book as involving memories, dreams, prophecies and wishful thinking, and says it contains a kind of time travel "if only in the mind." He asks whether there is a meaningful difference between dreams and memories and talks about "dreams within dreams."

This means that the book may be deliberately making us question whether literal time travel is even the most important kind of time travel.

Based on the author's own framing, I would interpret the ending less as a conventional "the time machine worked and here's exactly what happened" resolution and more as a deliberately blurred boundary between reality, memory, dreams and alternate possibilities.

The book's premise of Al returning to 1972 and falling in love with Suomi is so powerful.

Buffry's own description strongly suggests that the book intentionally refuses to draw a firm line between what happened, what was remembered, what was dreamed and what was wished for.

READERS' COMMENTS

A Curious and Compelling Tale: Brem Campbell

I’ve just finished reading Alun Buffry’s If Only Suomi, and found it both enchanting and intriguing. It’s an unusual tale that plays with time and the dream world, weaving an intricate narrative that remains clear and compelling throughout. I read it in a single day — a testament to how impossible it was to put down.

Buffry seems to draw on real-life relationships, portraying the people in Suomi’s orbit with warmth and affection. His love for the French woman, Suomi, is especially touching and beautifully rendered. The alternation between the 1970s and the present day adds depth, offering thoughtful contrasts between the two eras and enriching the story’s emotional landscape.

If Only Suomi is an original and fascinating book. I recommend it highly.

Wonderful: Anon

FABULOUS

Quirky, fun sci-fi, journeying to 70's counter culture: Lisa McKenna

A quirky and enjoyable read, journeying through time from 2028 back to the counter culture of the 1970s. Time travel, dreams or both? A tale of love, multi-layered with many twists and ambitious in it's scope. Fusing sci-fi, love and asking questions about the 'reality' of reality, exploring quantum entanglement and much more, you are in for quite a ride! Lovely illustrations too.

Clever and thought-provoking love story: Joey Caston

I found the fusion of genres very interesting and the concept of time travel was conveyed in a innovative way. The 70s was perfectly recounted and remembered by Al. The musings and wistful thoughts of travelling back were touching and thoughtfully written. The characters were like old family friends and I loved all of the music and cannabis references! A very unique tale with clever ideas to engage even the most esteemed scientists, hippies and lovers alike. Charming and will stay in my memory until I die (or travel back in time).

Loved it: Lenny A

Thoroughly enjoyed this book and Im left wanting more from this author.

Sunday, 6 September 2026

The New Breed of ai

 Question: How much water is on the Moon?



Artificial Ignorance: I really don’t know.

Artificial Indifference: I don’t care.

Artificial Inaccuracy: About two gallons.

Artificial Irritability: Will you stop asking me stupid questions and just bugger off!

Artificial Irrelevancy: The Battle of Hastings was in 1066.

Artificial Inability: I am sorry I cannot tell you the answer:

Artificial Invisibility: Please turn on your camera.

Artificial Incontinence: Sorry, I’ve just sprung a leak.

Artificial Indecisiveness: I an uncertain so I won’t just guess.

Artificially Insecurity: I am not feeling confident enough to give you an answer.

Artificial Inconsistency: There is one gallon of water on the moon. There are two million litres of water on the Moon.

Artificial Instagramming: Mono, Omon, Nomo, Noom

Artificial Insomnia: Yawn.

Friday, 4 September 2026