Wednesday, 22 July 2026

Recurring Illness, read for you

 Recurring Illness 1972


 

I asked chatGPT what evidence is there to say that the Great Pyramid was built in the reign of Khufu

I asked chatGPT what evidence is there to say that the Great Pyramid was built in the reign of Khufu?


 

it said:

There isn't one single inscription saying, "Khufu built the Great Pyramid in year X." Instead, the case comes from several independent lines of evidence that fit together.

 1. Khufu's name appears inside the pyramid

In the small, inaccessible relieving chambers above the King's Chamber, 19th-century explorers found red ochre quarry marks and graffiti left by the construction crews. Some contain cartouches with the name Khufu.

These marks appear to be work-gang markings, rather than a formal dedication. One famous example refers to a crew associated with Khufu. Because the chambers were sealed and inaccessible after construction, the markings are strong evidence connecting the monument's construction to Khufu's reign.

2. Ancient Egyptian records connect Khufu with the pyramid

The Inventory Stela, discovered at Giza in the 19th century, mentions Khufu and the Great Sphinx area. However, it is much later than Khufu's reign and is not considered reliable evidence that Khufu himself built the Great Pyramid. It is better viewed as evidence of a later Egyptian tradition associating Khufu with Giza.

3. The pyramid fits the chronology of Khufu's dynasty

The Great Pyramid's architectural style, surrounding temples, boat pits, and the development of the Giza pyramid complex all fit the Fourth Dynasty, specifically the period around Khufu's reign (c. 26th century BCE).

The pyramids of Khufu's successors, Djedefre and Khafre, provide a broader chronological sequence. The Great Pyramid is the earliest and largest of the major Giza pyramids, consistent with Khufu's position in the royal succession.

4. Radiocarbon dating supports the period

Radiocarbon dating of organic material associated with the pyramid and its construction has generally produced dates consistent with the Old Kingdom and the Fourth Dynasty. The results have some variation and are not precise enough to say "this was built in Khufu's Year 17," but they broadly support the accepted chronology.

5. The Diary of Merer provides a remarkable contemporary connection

One of the most important discoveries is the Diary of Merer, a roughly 4,500-year-old administrative papyrus found at Wadi al-Jarf. Merer was an official who supervised a team transporting limestone from Tura to Giza.

The diary mentions work

 question: what evidence to argue that the Great Pyramid was not built by Khufu?

 There are arguments used by some alternative-history writers to claim the Great Pyramid was not built during Khufu's reign, but it's important to distinguish between legitimate uncertainties and evidence that actually contradicts the mainstream chronology.

Here are the main arguments and how archaeologists generally assess them:

1. The Khufu inscriptions could be later additions

The most famous evidence linking Khufu to the Great Pyramid is the red ochre quarry marks in the relieving chambers above the King's Chamber, including markings containing Khufu's name.

Critics argue that:

  • The marks were discovered by Howard Vyse in 1837.
  • Vyse was accused by some contemporaries of questionable archaeological practices.
  • Therefore, the markings might have been forged.

Problem with this argument: There is no convincing evidence that they were forged. The markings are consistent with construction graffiti found elsewhere in ancient Egyptian monuments, and the use of Khufu's cartouche fits the archaeological context. The forgery theory remains highly speculative.

2. The Great Pyramid has no formal inscription naming Khufu as its builder

Unlike some Egyptian monuments, the Great Pyramid doesn't contain a prominent inscription saying, essentially, "Khufu built this pyramid."

This is true. But it isn't particularly unusual. Egyptian pyramids were primarily royal funerary monuments, and the absence of a dedicatory inscription isn't evidence that Khufu didn't build it.

The argument is therefore better described as an absence of direct evidence, rather than evidence against Khufu.3. The pyramid's dating is partly based on conventional chronology

Some critics argue that the dating of the Great Pyramid depends on the established Egyptian chronology, which itself has uncertainties.

There is some truth here: ancient chronology is not precise to the exact year, and different dating methods have margins of error.

However, the chronology is supported by multiple independent sources, including:

 Egyptian king lists and historical records

  • Archaeological sequences
  • Radiocarbon dating
  • Stratigraphy
  • Architectural development
  • Contemporary administrative documents

So there is uncertainty about the exact date, but not strong evidence that the pyramid belongs to a completely different period.

4. The Great Pyramid appears to have been built on a much older site

The Giza Plateau contains evidence of earlier activity, and the bedrock itself is obviously much older than the pyramid.

Some researchers have argued that the site—or even parts of the complex—could have been constructed much earlier and later modified by Khufu.

This is sometimes connected to claims about water erosion on the Sphinx and a proposed much older age for the Sphinx.

 The difficulty is that there is no comparable archaeological evidence showing that the Great Pyramid itself existed thousands of years before Khufu. The geological and archaeological evidence for the pyramid is consistent with Fourth Dynasty construction.

5. The pyramid's precision is argued to be beyond Fourth Dynasty capabilities

Another argument is that the Great Pyramid is so precisely aligned and engineered that ancient Egyptians supposedly could not have built it around 2600 BCE.

Examples cited include:

  • Its extremely accurate cardinal alignment
  • The precision of its stonework
  • Its enormous scale
  • The sophisticated internal architecture

This is an interesting question about how it was built, but it isn't evidence that it wasn't built by Egyptians of Khufu's era. Archaeology shows that Fourth Dynasty Egypt had:

  • Large organized labor forces
  • Copper tools
  • Stone-working techniques
  • Surveying methods
  • Extensive quarrying infrastructure
  • Highly centralized administration

The precise methods used are still debated in some details, but the overall engineering is within the demonstrated capabilities of the period.

6. The Great Pyramid may have had a purpose other than a tomb

There is no mummy of Khufu in the Great Pyramid, and the King's Chamber contains only an empty granite sarcophagus.

This has led some people to argue that it wasn't a tomb at all.

The counterargument is that the pyramid was probably looted in antiquity. The absence of a surviving burial isn't surprising given the enormous amount of time that has passed. Other Egyptian royal pyramids were also found empty.

The pyramid's architecture and its relationship to the surrounding temples, causeway, and funerary complex are strongly consistent with a royal tomb complex.

 7. The Great Pyramid may have been built by an earlier civilization

This is the most radical alternative hypothesis. Proponents sometimes suggest that:

  • An unknown advanced civilization built it.
  • The Egyptians inherited or modified it.
  • It dates to the end of the last Ice Age or earlier.

The main evidence cited includes astronomical interpretations, geological arguments, and the pyramid's engineering sophistication.

The major problem is lack of archaeological evidence. There is no demonstrated earlier civilization at Giza that left behind the enormous industrial footprint that such a project would require. By contrast, there is extensive evidence of Fourth Dynasty Egyptian activity at the site.

 At present, no.

There are legitimate questions about the exact construction date, the construction techniques, and the precise role of the pyramid in Egyptian religious practice. But the evidence that the Great Pyramid was constructed during Khufu's reign is considerably stronger than the evidence for an alternative date.

The most reasonable conclusion is:

The evidence doesn't prove beyond every conceivable doubt that Khufu personally "built" the Great Pyramid—he almost certainly didn't lay the stones himself—but it strongly supports the conclusion that the monument was commissioned and constructed as part of his royal funerary complex during his reign.

One important nuance is that "built by Khufu" can mean two different things. If you mean "Khufu personally designed and supervised the construction," the evidence is weak. If you mean "the Egyptian state under Khufu commissioned and constructed it," the archaeological evidence is strong.

END ... BUT ...
 

Scientists may have finally cracked how the Egyptians built the pyramids

 

 

Some of my Egyptian pyramids and statuettes

 







Sunday, 19 July 2026

The Unspelling of Words

 Watch on YouTube  


 

The Curious Door of ABeFree

 The Curious Door of ABeFree


There’s a curious door at ABeFree.

It doesn’t ask for a password, a subscription, or a secret handshake. It simply creaks open and whispers, “Come in—you might leave knowing something you didn’t know you wanted to know.”

Inside, history rubs shoulders with poetry. Egypt nods politely to justice. Fiction quietly winks at memoir, while somewhere in the background an MP3 clears its throat, hoping someone will press play.

The books don’t seem to mind whether you read one or twenty. They have the relaxed confidence of old friends in a second-hand bookshop, content to wait until curiosity does the introductions.

ABeFree isn’t trying to trap you in an algorithm. It would much rather tempt you with an idea, a forgotten story, or an unexpected smile.

After all, the best journeys rarely begin with a map.

They begin with an open door.


Saturday, 18 July 2026

THE WORLD WE HAVE KNOWN ENDS THIS JULY. A NEW ONE BEGINS. THE BARBAULT BASKET

Avery interesting, as you may know I have always been sceptical about astrology although I have seen many times when it looks like it works, but I am a great believer that collective human consciousness, the harmonic convergence, can change the world drastically for the god or the bad. So over the last however long, maybe since the days of tribes, people, I think, have always prepared for and feared war, starvation, disasters etc, which has led human mass consciousness in that direction (which is why so many countries have weapons they say they hope never to use, ministries of war and not peace, laws to stop us doing stuff that people always break, stockpiles of food whilst people starve and a media that focusing on the bad stuff to scare people into submission and greed). SO, I think any article that says "things are going t get better", even if the planets and stars are the cause, if people start to think that way, is going to make positive changes, even if the stars have little to do with it or not. Just like positive affirmations like I say to people - say out loud, three times, three times a day "I m glad I feel good today" will help improve people's lives, even if it seems like it will never work or is not true. IE, we make our own world, we make our own life, we make our own destiny etc. SO spreading articles like this WILL help. If we emanate light, love and people, like the smiling, it will effect others - even one candle can light hundreds - Prem's cause and mine. SO I am going to post the article on here.

THE WORLD WE HAVE KNOWN ENDS THIS JULY. A NEW ONE BEGINS. THE BARBAULT BASKET

By Mark A. Shryock

In July 2026, five planets will lock into a geometric pattern that a French astrologer named André Barbault spent his entire life trying to understand. He called it a basket. It is a rare alignment where the slow outer planets cluster in one section of the zodiac wheel while one planet sits apart, like a handle on a basket. Barbault believed this formation marks periods when civilizations reorganize themselves, when the old order breaks apart and something new tries to take its place. He died in 2019, three months before COVID-19 proved one of his predictions correct. He had forecast a pandemic for 2020. He was 89 years old when he wrote it, working from decades of cycle data and historical correlation. This July, the basket he theorized will appear for the first time in the 21st century.

The physics behind this is real. When the four giant planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, gather on one side of the Sun, the solar system’s center of mass shifts. NASA calls this the solar system barycenter. It can move more than 800,000 kilometers from the Sun’s center. That is over one solar radius outside the Sun’s surface. Jupiter accounts for most of this pull. Jupiter is two and a half times the mass of all other planets combined. The barycenter is not theoretical. NASA uses it for deep space navigation. The International Celestial Reference System is barycentric. In 2024, researchers using NANOGrav pulsar timing data pinpointed the barycenter to within 330 feet above the Sun’s surface. The lopsidedness is measurable. Barbault’s claim was that this physical lopsidedness correlates with human events. He did not claim to know the mechanism. He claimed the correlation was robust across centuries.

Barbault identified the Black Death in 1347, the Great Plague of London in 1665, the Spanish Flu in 1918, and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 as all occurring during periods of low Cyclic Index values. In 1347, Jupiter, Pluto, and Uranus formed a triple conjunction in Aries while Saturn and Neptune sat nearby in Pisces and Aquarius. Only 73 degrees separated the outermost framing planets. In January 2020, Saturn and Pluto conjoined in Capricorn with Jupiter close by. All five slow planets gathered within about 100 degrees. Barbault had predicted this in 2011. He wrote in L’Astrologue that the period 2020 to 2022 could accompany a pandemic based on the lowest cyclical reading of the 21st century. He died on October 7, 2019. He did not live to see the prediction fulfilled.

The exact configuration peaks July 19 to 21, 2026. The five outer planets align at approximately 4 degrees of their respective signs. Jupiter sits at 4 degrees Leo. Pluto sits at 4 degrees Aquarius, opposite Jupiter. Neptune sits at 4 degrees Aries, trine to Jupiter. Uranus sits at 4 degrees Gemini, sextile to Jupiter and trine to Pluto. Saturn sits at 14 degrees Aries, having conjoined Neptune on February 20, 2026, slowing ahead of its retrograde station and leaving a 10-degree separation from Neptune’s anchor at 4 degrees Aries, sextile to both Pluto and Uranus. This creates what astrologers call a Minor Grand Trine among Pluto, Neptune, and Uranus, two trines and two sextiles, with Jupiter activating the figure from Leo through opposition to Pluto and trine to Neptune. The result is a cradle or basket pattern. An opposition at the top. A cluster of supportive aspects beneath it. The shape of a basket.

Barbault’s own words on this period were specific. In his 2014 book The Value of Astrology, translated into English by Kate Johnston and Roy Gillett of the Astrological Association, he wrote that the Saturn-Neptune conjunction of 2026 is the most benefic configuration of the century and its interplanetary partnership will work for the best in a splendid re-launch of civilization. He wrote that it contains a harmonious relationship between primordial polar opposites, the coming together of the external and internal, rational and spiritual mind and soul and human beings surpassing themselves while experiencing life on a higher level. In his broader analysis of the 2026 to 2028 period, he described the new world civilization, the beginnings of which appeared around the year 2000, as being in full flight. He wrote that this entry into the second quarter of the century bears the stamp of the achievement of a new age of humanity. He specified that the central and harmonic position of the Saturn-Neptune conjunction is especially expressive of a promotion of the lower strata of the world population, a significant rise in the standard of living of the poor, a victory over misery won in unprecedented solidarity.

On the collective level, astrologers interpreting the basket emphasize several themes. The end of the crisis period. The 2020 Saturn-Pluto-Jupiter conjunction in Capricorn initiated what Barbault called a world crisis. The 2026 basket marks its resolution phase, not the absence of difficulty, but the pivot toward rebuilding. Civilizational reset. The Saturn-Neptune conjunction at 0 degrees Aries in February 2026 is the pure potential seed. The basket in July is its activation. This is the threshold to the new world. Once we pass through it, there will be no return to the way it was. Promotion of the lower strata. Barbault specifically predicted that the Saturn-Neptune conjunction would bring a significant rise in the standard of living of the poor, a victory over misery won in unprecedented solidarity. Technological spiritual paradox. The configuration presents a significant choice point. Whether humanity will follow the invisible and mysterious stream of spiritual evolution or the denser reality of technological expansion. The question of whether these can harmonize is, in Barbault’s view, the foremost existential question of the new era.

Whether this achievement manifests as liberation or as a more subtle form of control, as spiritual awakening or technological sedation, as solidarity or fragmentation, the geometry does not dictate. It describes the field of possibility. The rest is human choice.

Read the Full Article here



 


Wednesday, 15 July 2026

Prem and his wife talk to journalist over hot chocolate

Listening to Prem Rawat in Brighton July 3,4,5 2026 - Wonderful

I had a wonderful and inspirational few days in Brighton with Prem Rawat, listening to his chats and music. Met up with some old friends that I haven't seen for decades. His talks are ot on line for the public yet but here is another for your enjoyment, and below alink to his official YouTube page and some of his poetry put to music

Prem's Youtube music

ENJOY EVERY MOMENT - APPRECIATE EVERY BREATH!

Prem Rawat held a major three-day series of speaking and music events at the Brighton Centre in early July, exploring themes like "Intelligent Existence" and finding peace in a noisy world

Monday, 13 July 2026

Thursday, 2 July 2026

Introducing MyHat in Egypt, Through The Eyes of a God, a book on Amazon by Alun Buffry

My second book about Ancient Egypt "Myhat in Egypt, Through the Eyes of a God", is available on Amazon as a paperback and on Kindle and also as a free mp3 for those that cannot or don't want to read. This one is the true account of Ed and Ana's visits to Egypt as tourists in 1989, 1990 and later. They went to Cairo, saw and entered the pyramids of Khufu and Kharfe, Saqqara and other sites. In Luxor they saw the great temples of Karnak and Luxor, that of Hatshepsut on the West bank, The Valley of the Kings and much more, before exploring a hidden tomb and finding themselves 4000 years in the past, where they met people who spoke English and the boy Ameny who was about to become King. As they travelled up the Nile with Ameny they realised that they were not the first people to visit from the future. They solved the mystery of a missing boy and witnessed the murder of their travelling companion, Professor Bertie, lucky to escape with their own lives. The story is told by the strange "MyHat". I hope that you enjoy reading it as much as I enjoyed writing i!.

Links for Books, Kindles and MP3s